When Design Heritage Reached Westminster > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Budgets, healthcare, international relations. Yet in May 2025, MPs were talking about light. Ms Qureshi, delivered a striking intervention. Her message was uncompromising: real neon is both craft and culture. She criticised the flood of LED strips, saying they undermine public trust. If it is not glass and gas, it is not neon. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, sharing his own commissioning of neon art in Teesside.

Cross-party nodding followed. Statistics gave weight to the passion. The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, a century-old craft may die. Ideas were floated for a protection act, modelled on Champagne. Preserve authenticity. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose, pointing to industry growth. Neon remains a growth sector. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist. The final word fell to Chris Bryant. He allowed himself puns, drawing laughter.

Yet beneath the levity, he recognised the seriousness. He recalled iconic glows: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He suggested neon is unfairly judged on eco terms. Why the debate? The answer is authenticity. Consumers are misled. That threatens heritage. Comparable to food and textile protections. If Scotch must come from Scotland, then craft deserves recognition. This was about identity. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street?

We hold no doubt: glass and gas still matter. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. The Act is still to come. But the spotlight has been lit. If Parliament can value neon, so should you. Reject plastic strips. Keep the glow alive.

In the event you loved this post and you want to receive more information regarding BrightGlow Signs please visit the web site.