Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes issues such as access, waiting lists, healthcare coverage, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly financed health care system of England, created under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has actually come under much criticism, especially during the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back many years, including over the arrangement of mental health care in the 1970s and 1980s (ultimately part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and spends too much on medical facility newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the cost of which soared from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making health care a mainly "invisible cost" to the patient, healthcare appears to be efficiently free to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To lower expenses and ensure that everybody is treated equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The general specialist (GP) functions as a main gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is typically impossible to acquire greater courses of treatment, such as an appointment with a specialist. These are argued to be necessary - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in your house of Commons, "we shall never ever have all we require ... expectations will constantly go beyond capacity". [2] On the other hand, the national medical insurance systems in other nations (e.g. Germany) have actually dispensed with the requirement for referral; direct access to an expert is possible there. [3]

There has actually been issue about opportunistic "health tourists" travelling to Britain (mostly London) and using the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British people have actually been understood to take a trip to other European countries to benefit from lower costs, and since of a fear of hospital-acquired super bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS access is therefore managed by medical priority rather than rate mechanism, leading to waiting lists for both and surgical treatment, approximately months long, although the Labour federal government of 1997-onwards made it among its crucial targets to minimize waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation could be 2 years; there were aspirations to lower it to 18 weeks regardless of opposition from doctors. [6] It is contested that this system is fairer - if a medical complaint is acute and deadly, a client will reach the front of the line quickly.

The NHS measures medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a method of measuring the advantage of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this technique of assigning healthcare implies some clients must lose out in order for others to get, which QALY is a crude method of making life and death decisions. [8]

Hospital got infections

There have been a number of deadly break outs of antibiotic resistant germs (" incredibly bugs") in NHS hospitals, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has actually led to criticism of standards of health across the NHS, with some clients purchasing private health insurance coverage or travelling abroad to avoid the perceived risk of capturing a "extremely bug" while in medical facility. However, the department of health vowed ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England health centers in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The lack of availability of some treatments due to their viewed poor cost-effectiveness in some cases results in what some call a "postcode lotto". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the first gatekeeper, and analyze the cost effectiveness of all drugs. Until they have actually released guidance on the expense and efficiency of brand-new or costly medications, treatments and procedures, NHS services are unlikely to offer to money courses of treatment. The very same of true of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's equivalent in Scotland. [13]

There has actually been significant controversy about the general public health financing of expensive drugs, significantly Herceptin, due to its high cost and viewed limited general survival. The campaign waged by cancer sufferers to get the government to spend for their treatment has gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it licensed. [14] [15] Your Home of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug business for bringing in drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limitation that is thought about the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the concept of private financing effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all new health center structure was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise money and able to manage public sector expense. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the terms of PFI agreements. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (building of brand-new facilities) needed to take a look at whether PFI was preferable to utilizing public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 reasonably small projects had been prepared for, at a total cost of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, buildings were built and serviced by the economic sector, and after that leased back to the NHS. The Labour government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI tasks, thinking that public spending required to be reduced. [16]

Under the private finance effort, an increasing number of health centers have actually been constructed (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the federal government likewise motivated personal sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been considerable criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health showing that for each ₤ 200 million invested in independently financed medical facilities the NHS loses 1000 medical professionals and nurses. The very first PFI medical facilities consist of some 28% less beds than the ones they changed. [18] In addition to this, it has been noted that the return for building companies on PFI contracts might be as high as 58%, and that in financing health centers from the private instead of public sector cost the NHS practically half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have actually occurred within the NHS throughout the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including kids's organs, in between 1988 and 1995. The official report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, exposed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had purchased the "dishonest and prohibited stripping of every organ from every child who had had a postmortem." In reaction, it has been argued that the scandal brought the problem of organ and tissue contribution into the general public domain, and highlighted the benefits to medical research study that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s concerned opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s concerned abnormally high death rates amongst patients at the health center. [22] [23] Approximately 1200 more patients died between 2005 and 2008 than would be anticipated for the type and size of health center [24] [25] based on figures from a mortality design, however the last Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misinforming to link the inadequate care to a particular number or variety of varieties of deaths. [26] A public query later on exposed numerous instances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of clients. [27]

" Lack of self-reliance of looking for security and physical fitness for purpose"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated health care, NHS England is worked on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with inspecting if the care provided by the NHS is really safe and suitable for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in fact "responsible to the general public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its financing comes from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is for that reason the potential for a dispute of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the very same management and both are extremely vulnerable to political interference.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins urged NHS England to prioritize evidence and safety in gender dysphoria treatment following issues raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult centers and initiated an evaluation, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed limitations on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall invited the evaluation's concentrate on kids's well-being. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of medical facilities in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a routine information analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to guarantee that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health tourists could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors attack Blair's waiting list pledge". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do medical facilities make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the initial on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug declined for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the original on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI hospitals 'costing NHS extra ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances needed for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport medical facility deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog says". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'should be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have caused 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford medical facility scandal: Up to 1,200 may have died over "shocking" client care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How lots of people died "unnecessarily" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit hospital escapes cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England must end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our health care. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.