The General Public has never Seen the U.S. Government Force-Feed Somebody - Till Now > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Warning: This article contains graphic accounts of force-feeding. Ajay Kumar set out from India in June 2018, eventually ending up on the U.S. California, the place he declared his intention to hunt political asylum. He was then taken into the custody of U.S. Immigration and top brain supplement for 2025 Customs Enforcement, top brain supplement for 2025 anticipating to be launched as he awaited his hearings. Instead, he languished in detention top brain supplement for 2025 nearly a 12 months. So he began a protest. In July 2019, along with three other Indian asylum-seekers, natural cognitive enhancer Kumar undertook a hunger strike, https://neurosurges.net demanding launch from ICE detention. The company responded by transferring him to the El Paso Service Processing Center in Texas, an ICE jail operated by the firm Global Precision Systems. With Kumar more than a month into the starvation strike, top brain supplement for 2025 the government, top brain supplement for 2025 utilizing Justice Department lawyers, sought a judge’s order to pressure-feed him and the other three males. With the judge’s approval, contractors working on the detention heart on ICE’s behalf started the technique of involuntarily feeding Kumar in August 2019, 37 days since his final meal.

The method was captured on video. "I asked them to provide me my freedom. If they had granted it at the moment, there would have been no want for all of this," Kumar said. "This will not be humanity. Historically, the federal government’s drive-feeding procedures have been mired in secrecy, with even the court docket orders to carry it out continuously issued under seal. Video, courtroom records, and medical records reviewed by The Intercept within the case of the El Paso detention heart provide a firsthand take a look at how the procedure is authorized and executed - including the primary publicly launched video of pressure-feeding executed underneath the auspices of the federal government. National and international medical organizations consider drive-feeding hunger strikers a transgression of medical ethics; the process has been criticized as torture by worldwide human rights organizations. The video, almost one hour lengthy, reveals five detention guards in riot gear, employed by Global Precision Systems, introduce themselves to the digital camera in preparation for their "calculated use of force" on Kumar.

The guards enter the ability infirmary, the place medical personnel clarify the procedure to the asylum-seeker by a translator and start their makes an attempt to insert a nasogastric tube. Medical officials didn't correctly insert the tube two instances before efficiently starting the force-feeding. In keeping with ICE’s Performance-Based National Detention Standards, each time there's a "calculated use of drive," workers are required to use a handheld digicam to file the incident. The Intercept, with Kumar’s consent, requested the video by means of the freedom of data Act. After ICE refused to turn over the footage, The Intercept filed a lawsuit and ICE subsequently agreed to turn over the footage, but the company redacted the faces and names of everyone who appears in it, aside from Kumar. We’re independent of corporate interests - and powered by members. Join Our Newsletter Thank you For Joining! Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you're taking the next step to assist our impartial journalism by turning into a member of The Intercept?

By signing up, I comply with obtain emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Kumar watched the video for the first time with The Intercept, which also confirmed the footage to 4 experts from universities and advocacy organizations, who work on drugs and immigration detention. "The process of watching this hourlong video was excruciating, top brain supplement for 2025 knowing what Ajay was going by," stated Joanna Naples-Mitchell, analysis adviser for the U.S. Physicians for Human Rights. Asylum-seekers, when positioned in ICE custody, are fighting civil immigration cases. Their authorized right to request asylum, however, doesn't preclude detention. They are often positioned in immigration detention centers. They typically keep under lock and key until their circumstances conclude, however in different situations they can argue for release to pursue their declare from the outside. Despite being placed in detention services whereas awaiting civil - not criminal - instances, situations for asylum-seekers are equivalent to jails and prisons.