MPs Get Their Glow On > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Normally Westminster is snooze city. Tax codes, pensions, boring bills. Yet last spring, the place actually glowed — because they argued about neon.

Ms Qureshi herself brought fire to the benches defending real exterior neon sign (visit the next document). She called out the fakes. Her line? If it’s not bent glass filled with neon gas, it ain’t neon.

Sharp speech. Neon is heritage, not a gimmick.

Stockton North’s Chris McDonald talking neon like a fanboy. The benches buzzed.

Then came the killer numbers: from hundreds, only a handful remain. Zero pipeline. Without protection, the craft dies.

She called for law like Harris Tweed or Champagne. Defend the glow.

Then Jim Shannon got involved. He waved growth reports. Growth at 7.5% yearly. His point: heritage and profit can mix.

Minister Bryant wrapped it up. He couldn’t resist wordplay. Deputy Speaker heckled him. But underneath the banter, the case was strong.

He nodded to cultural landmarks: Piccadilly Circus. He said glass and outdoor neon signs London gas beat plastic.

Why all this noise? Simple: consumers are being conned. Heritage vanishes.

Think Cornish pasties. If labels matter, why not neon?.

This was identity. Do we let craft die for cheap convenience?

We call BS: real neon rules.

The Commons got its glow-up. No law yet, the case is made.

If it belongs in Parliament, it belongs in your bar.

Skip the plastic. Bring the glow.