How to Write Review of Literature in IGNOU Project > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For many students enrolled in IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most elusive aspect of the work. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic rigor is expected. However, the direction often isn't clear. Students frequently ask if they require a summation of their books, make journal articles more readable, or simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that difference can change the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not a document that demonstrates how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend literature that is relevant to your field and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to connect theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is essential to know why the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three main goals.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you selected has been extensively studied and is of academic importance. Second, it helps you discover gaps or issues in previous studies. In addition, it can provide an understanding of research goals and methods.

Many students treat this chapter as a formality, and take content from other assignments or other online sources. This often results in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. In the same way extremely basic explanations are prohibited. For a project involving IGNOU MCOM project help (click here to read) MCOM the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

You're expected review research papers, books and reports, as well as journals and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your subject. The concentration should be on the studies related to your area of study.

For instance, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks the literature review should focus on prior research about financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty quality sources are usually sufficient in the event that they are carefully selected.

The best sources are academic journals reliable books from well-known creators, RBI books, public reports as well as university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years, ideally from the last 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered in the event that they are fundamental in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split this literature summary into logical sections.

The chapter could be structured according to themes, time period techniques, methodologies, or variables that are studied. For example, one section could discuss research related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, while another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see the difference between copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is academic, but simple. Avoid dense language and excessive language. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study you discuss should contain the name of author, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and important findings. It is not necessary to list them in a formal manner. Do your best to link one study to another.

For example, after discussing an article, you can mention how another author supported the results or countered them. This way of looking at comparisons adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like definition of accounting or meaning of management are not needed here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written in one's own terms. In the end, paraphrasing is an indication of understanding, while copying implies dependence.

Students may also not link works to their research focus. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection with the research goals.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed or if further research is needed.

When you look over a range of studies you'll realize that most studies were focused on large businesses and small businesses were absent. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary data was scarce.

This gap is the basis for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.

Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. Citations in text work better and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the review of literature must run. There's no definitive rule in the case of an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred in length to 2500 words.

The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires the most research, whereas a targeted topic requires fewer, but more extensive discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A looked into banking's performance and obtained good results

Write as this
Autor A conducted a research study on the performance of banks using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability improved through better asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by operational efficiency in boosting returns to banks.

This is an approach that demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is valued in an ignou mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are refused or delayed because of the use of copied literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previous studies, the terminology must be your own.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, make sure you read the literature review thoroughly. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if your flow follows logically and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes, that literature study is in the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project may be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning to college after a long absence. If you can realize that it is about analysis and connections rather than memorization of information, the task is manageable.

Do your best to read, think and write in your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly on the final piece and often is the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.