MPs Argue Over Real vs Fake Neon > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

It’s not often you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. You expect tax codes and foreign policy, not politicians debating signage. But on a late evening in May 2025, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. Yasmin Qureshi, MP for Bolton South and Walkden stood tall to back neon craftsmen. Her argument was simple: neon bending is an art form, and plastic pretenders are killing the craft. She hammered the point: if it isn’t glass bent by hand and filled with noble gas, it isn’t neon.

another Labour MP chimed in telling MPs about neon art in Teesside. Even the sceptics were glowing. Facts carried the weight. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. The next generation isn’t coming. The push was for protection like Harris Tweed or Champagne. Surprisingly, the DUP had neon fever too. He brought the numbers, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. His point was blunt: this isn’t nostalgia, it’s business. The government’s Chris Bryant wrapped up.

He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, getting teased by Madam Deputy Speaker. But beneath the jokes was recognition. He reminded MPs of Britain’s glow: Tracey Emin artworks. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. So why the debate? Because consumers are duped daily. That erases trust. Think Champagne. If champagne must come from France, signs should be no different. The night was more than politics.

Do we trade heritage for LED strips? We’re biased but right: gas and glass win every time. The Commons went neon. No law has passed yet, but the glow is alive. If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Skip the fakes. Support the craft.

Should you loved this short article and you would want to receive details with regards to GlowWave Neon i implore you to visit our own website.